Fukushima Minpo Hai Training Analysis 2026
── Pre-Race Slope Work × 1-Week-Prior Work × Race-Week Work × WHGR ──
April 12, 2026 (Sun) Fukushima Race 11 | Turf 2000m | 15 runners | Post time 15:15
1. Pre-Race Slope Work — Only 2 of 15 Runners
Only 2 of 15 runners worked the slope the day before. Compared to the Oka Sho (5) and Kyobashi Stakes (8), the number is extremely low. The long transport distance from Miho and Ritto to Fukushima likely prevents most stables from fitting in a pre-race session.
| # | Horse | 4F | 1F | Lap | WHGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | Meiner Mont | 70.5 | 17.3 | Decel | — |
| 5 | Mamma Riare | 71.2 | 17.1 | Accel | −190 |
Both in the 70-second range — light exercise only. Pre-race slope provides no competitive signal in this race.
2. 1-Week-Prior vs. Race-Week — Readiness Comparison
A. Stable Type — Hard Work Both Weeks
| # | Horse | 1 Wk Prior | Race Wk | Change | WHGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Savona | Slope 51.4★ | Slope 51.6★ | +0.2 | +90 |
| 6 | Ask du Porte | Slope 52.6★ | Slope 55.1◎ | +2.5 | +180 |
B. Improving Type
| # | Horse | 1 Wk Prior | Race Wk | Change | WHGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | Today Is the Day | Slope 64.3 | Slope 63.1 | −1.2 | −40 |
| 14 | Schilthorn | Slope 68.1 | Slope 66.3 | −1.8 | +125◎ |
C. Race-Week Rush Type
| # | Horse | 1 Wk Prior | Race Wk | Change | WHGR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | Gaia Mente | Slope 63.3 | Slope 55.7 | −7.6 | +290★★ |
| 7 | Ballet Master | Slope 61.1 | Slope 53.6 | −7.5 | −190 |
| 15 | Dandyism | Slope 67.5 | Slope 55.1 | −12.4 | +10 |
3. Overall Assessment
| # | Horse | Readiness | WHGR | Pattern | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11 | Savona | Stable 51.4→51.6★★ fastest | +90◎ | — | A |
| 1 | Win Shukuran | No slope data (Miho wood) | +340★★ | 庚 1st + yang-odd 86% | A (WHGR+pattern) |
| 8 | Gaia Mente | Rush 63.3→55.7 | +290★★ | Handoff candidate | B+ |
| 6 | Ask du Porte | Relaxed 52.6→55.1 (1wk fastest★) | +180◎ | B+ | |
| 4 | Libyan Grass | No slope data (wood) | +270★★ | 庚 top-3 + handoff | B+ (WHGR+pattern) |
| 13 | Barnaba | Minimal slope (light only) | +270★★ | Frequent top-3 | B (WHGR only) |
Conclusion
1. #11 Savona — Stable type with 51.4→51.6, the fastest times of all runners both weeks. Posting 51-second times in consecutive weeks is the mark of a well-trained horse. WHGR is a modest +90 but training is impeccable.
2. #1 Win Shukuran — Based at Miho, so no Ritto slope data. However, WHGR +340 leads the field, plus a five-axis pattern overlap including 庚-stem 1st place record and yang × odd 86%. Even without training data, pattern and WHGR strongly support.
3. #6 Ask du Porte — 1-week-prior slope of 52.6★ was near the top of the field. Race week eased to 55.1. An ideal peaked-readiness pattern. WHGR +180.
4. Pre-race slope provides no signal — both entries were at exercise level (70s range). At Fukushima, “1-week vs. race-week readiness” and “WHGR + pattern analysis” are more reliable decision tools.
Training time data sourced from JRA-VAN Data Lab.
This article does not constitute a recommendation to purchase betting tickets. All wagering is at your own risk.
White & Green Co., Ltd. / TigerProtocol WHGR System v2.1